next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title

29:50 Modern Astronomy
Fall 1999
Lecture 10 ...September 15, 1999
Stellar Brightness, Other Stellar Properties

Watch the skies! Watch the skies!
tex2html_wrap_inline39 Planets in the morning sky. You can see Jupiter, Saturn, and Venus.
tex2html_wrap_inline70 Mars is now in the constellation of Scorpius, not far from Antares.
tex2html_wrap_inline70 Vega, Altair, and tex2html_wrap_inline45 Ophiuchi form a triangle.

Absolute Magnitude and Stellar Distances
Last time defined the Absolute Magnitude as the Apparent Magnitude a star would have if it were at a distance of 10 parsecs. It is a measure of the intrinsic brightness of a star. The absolute magnitude of the Sun is +4.85. Let see how the Sun stacks up against other stars.
tex2html_wrap_inline47 Look at Appendix 12 of your textbook, a list of the brightest stars. Stars with Absolute Magnitudes of tex2html_wrap_inline49 are not uncommon. These are about 10 magnitudes more luminous than the Sun. This equals a factor of tex2html_wrap_inline51 in luminosity!

tex2html_wrap_inline47 This indicates clearly the range in stellar properties. Stars span a huge range in their properties.

tex2html_wrap_inline70 Why is the absolute magnitude of a star (or other types of objects) important? Because it provides a way of determining the distance to an object, and thus permits us to map out the universe.

tex2html_wrap_inline57 The case of Alpha Ophiuchi. Alpha Ophiuchi is close to Vega on the night sky, but is markedly fainter. Vega has a visual magnitude of 0.03, while tex2html_wrap_inline45 Ophiuchi has m=2.08, so it is almost exactly 2 magnitudes fainter, or a factor of 6.3 in brightness.

Nonetheless, if we take a spectrum of each of these two stars and compare them, we find they are almost identical. They are so called ``A stars''.
tex2html_wrap_inline47 Spectrum of A star.
tex2html_wrap_inline65 The conclusion is that Alpha Ophiuchi is a clone of Vega, but is further away. Let's get quantitative and determine how much further.

The inverse square law for light
As a source of light gets further away, it becomes fainter.
tex2html_wrap_inline47 Illustration with demonstration
Physics tells us exactly how this happens. It happens via the inverse square law. Let's let L be the luminosity of a source of light, which is just like the power output of a lightbulb, and is expressed in Watts. The source of light is a distance r away. b is the brightness that we measure (to be exact, the flux of radiation in Watts/m tex2html_wrap_inline104 ). The brightness is then given by

equation15

If we consider the brightness of the same object at two distances tex2html_wrap_inline77 and tex2html_wrap_inline79 , we then have tex2html_wrap_inline81

tex2html_wrap_inline39 Let's apply these ideas to the stars. tex2html_wrap_inline45 Ophiuchi is a factor of 6.3 fainter than Vega, although of the same intrinsic brightness. This means that the ratio of the distance to tex2html_wrap_inline45 Ophiuchi to that of Vega is

equation19

So tex2html_wrap_inline45 Ophiuchi is 2.51 times further away than Vega. Since the distance to Vega is 8 parsecs (See Appendix 12), this means that tex2html_wrap_inline45 Ophiuchi is 20 parsecs away.

tex2html_wrap_inline93 The difference between the apparent and absolute magnitude is similarly a measure of the distance to an object. This difference m - M tells you how many magnitudes fainter (or brighter) a star is relative to what it would be at a distance of 10 parsecs. Using arguments similar to those above, we can find the ratio of the true distance of a star to a distance of 10 parsecs.

In view of this, the difference between the apparent and absolute magnitude is called the distance modulus in astronomy. The formula for the relation between distance and distance modulus is

equation24

where d is the distance in parsecs.

This equation can be used to generate the following table.

Distance Modulus - Distance Relation

tabular29

These equations are of extreme importance in contemporary astronomy. In the last year, there have been articles on the front page of the New York Times describing the results of the Hubble Space Telescope ``Key Project''. They have observed, for the first time, a class of star called Cepheid variables, with absolute magnitudes of tex2html_wrap_inline105 , in galaxies of the ``Virgo Cluster'' at apparent magnitudes tex2html_wrap_inline107 . You can figure out for yourself what the significance of this observation is.

The Diversity of Stellar Properties
tex2html_wrap_inline70 By this time we have gotten the idea that there is a good deal of variety in the characteristics of stars. They vary greatly in temperature and luminosity. They also vary greatly in mass. Can we see any patterns in this?

The observational approach to answering this question is to make a graph, in which we plot the absolute magnitude of a star versus its surface temperature. We could also plot it as luminosity (relative to the Sun) versus Spectral Type. The spectral classes of stars are discussed in your book and are O,B,A,F,G,K,M.

The result of this plot is one of the most important experimental finding of astronomy, and is referred to as the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. It is shown in Figure 16-20 of your textbook.




next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title

Steve Spangler
Tue Sep 14 14:44:54 CDT 1999